National biosecurity contact points are being set up at the Science and Technology Council, the Vice-President`s Office and the Ministry of Water and Environment in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. In addition, countries have developed systems to deal with requests for the introduction of GMOs into the environment, a monitoring, inspection and enforcement mechanism, and a streamlining of the roles and responsibilities of the institutions concerned. Other institutions involved are plant health institutions, ministries of agriculture, health, trade and industry, National Standards Offices, National Agricultural Research Systems, etc. The main international instruments that enable countries to cooperate on a wide range of global environmental challenges are international conventions and treaties on the environment and natural resources, also known as multilateral environmental agreements (EAs). Many multilateral environmental agreements (MEA) are a body to monitor the agreement. The guidelines for an AED are defined by the participating countries. The United Nations and the World Trade Organization are important intergovernmental organizations for forging and implementing agreements. A complex network system is required for an operational MEA system.  Levels of government within a nation can interfere with each other with respect to climate change (for example) because they have opposing views or parties which complicates implementation and undermines external relations. An agreement between two nations is called a bilateral agreement on the environment.
If the agreement is reached between three or more nations, it is called the Multilateral Agreement on the Environment (MEA). Such agreements, first concluded by the United Nations, deal with issues such as atmospheric policy, freshwater policy, waste and hazardous substances policy, the marine environment, the protection of nature, noise pollution and nuclear safety.  Because of these obstacles, environmental protocols become an obvious objective for several critical points, such as slow production. B of the desired effects (due to the ratification process of the Convention), the maintenance of the lowest common denominator and the lack of monitoring and application. They can also be criticized for taking a progressive approach in which the principles of sustainable development indicate that environmental concerns must be taken into account in a coherent manner. Finally, countries may not be motivated to change their environmental policy because of conflicts with other interests, including economic prosperity. If environmental protocols cause economic hardship or damage to one country, it may escape protocols, while other countries comply with them, resulting in a classic problem of parasitism. In addition, environmental protocols can be criticized for scientific uncertainty or, at the very least, for a lack of synthesis of scientific information that can be used for “conflicting interests and disaster”.  This can now be seen as an excuse defined as skepticism about climate change. Between 1857 and 2012, 747 multilateral agreements on the environment were concluded.
 After the Intergovernmental Conference in Stockholm in 1972, the creation of international environmental agreements multiplied.  The United Nations has made MMAs popular, most MMAs have been implemented since 1972 at the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (also known as the Stockholm Conference).  The Stockholm Declaration was adopted by the 113 countries attending the conference and was the first major universal document in an environmental issue.  An international environmental agreement, or sometimes an environmental protocol, is a kind of treaty of international law that allows them to achieve an environmental objective. In other words, it is an “intergovernmental document that is designed as legally binding and is primarily aimed at preventing or managing the human impact on natural resources.”  In 2002, the Summit of