Following the suspension of Vivo`s contract and BCCI`s participation in the EOI for the sponsorship of IPL 2020, the fear was that, even within the cricket board, a market suffering from an economic emergency imposed by Covid would not be able to launch a replacement sponsor with a substantial amount of sponsorship. “All I can say is that all our sponsors are with us. I hope you can read between the lines,” he told ptI after Sunday`s meeting on the conditions of anonymity. The challenge for the Indian Board of Directors is now to find a new sponsor, as the tournament is scheduled to take place in the United Arab Emirates from 18 September. Given the popularity of the tournament, chances are the Indian council will be able to find a new sponsor. It remains to be seen whether the sponsor will be able to match the amount BCCI received each year from Vivo. According to the persons quoted in the first place, BCCI`s advanced soufflés were imprisoned during a conference call during the day in order to reach an amicable agreement with Vivo. On Tuesday, it was reported that the board had begun looking for a new sponsor for this season and on Thursday they officially announced that the agreement with Vivo had been temporarily suspended by mutual agreement. But this is not Vivo`s first dance with the IPL: even though the talk now surrounds the phone company and is the main sponsor of the IPL immediately after the withdrawal, Vivo`s relationship with the league began in the same way. Dream11 offered to pay 240 crore for IPL 2021 and IPL 2022 each time vivo unsubscribe.
After the IPL Deal Fallout vivo, in which the Chinese smartphone manufacturer had to pay 440 Us-Euro per year, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) was without a sponsor of IPL 2020. The fall of the IPL vivo was created because of the anti-Chinese atmosphere throughout the country after the India-China shutdown in the Galwan Valley, where 20 Indian soldiers were martyred in June. Amid border tensions with China, vivo – a Chinese manufacturer of mobile phones – and BCCI are about to take advantage of a case of force majeure and agree on the end of their five-year contract with another three editions. Instead, the tournament can be rescheduled and moved outside India, “can be considered a force majeure event,” Kamath added. “The removal of material from timelines and locations due to the pandemic could be considered a force majeure event, as these could be substantial changes to the original intent of the contract. This could have led to the suspension of commitments by mutual agreement. However, BCCI is aware that, in the face of the pandemic that has tarnished the global economy, market interest in sponsoring future publishing will be much less. It is assumed that a conglomerate of companies with close ties to an IPL franchise may attempt to expand its relationship with IPL. At the IPL Council meeting, which was finally held on 2 August, members were informed that there was no change in the sponsors of the title. After the meeting, the new dates of the IPL and the move to the United Arab Emirates were announced, with the name Vivo in the title.
A manager of another IPL franchise, who asked not to name him or his team, expressed concern about the financial consequences. “One of our claims was to be compensated for the loss of goal revenue,” he said. “If the central pool is affected by the Exit of Vivo, it will affect us hard. We look forward to a dialogue with BCCI. The move comes after BCCI and the IPL Governing Council were criticized for keeping in vivo as a title sponsor at a time when anti-Chinese sentiment is high in India. The government has banned Chinese applications, imposed strict restrictions on Chinese investment and reviewed the partnerships that Indian educational institutions have with Chinese institutions.